Rees Morrison has consulted to more than 250 law departments (and several law firms) over 22 years to help them better manage themselves and their outside counsel. For more, visit reesmorrison.com, email me, or call 973.568.9110.

All posts (C) 2005-9 Rees W. Morrison.
If you would like a Metapost Plus: please email me with the name and I will send it.

Archive by Month


Archive by Category
Technorati Profile Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.

« Shared services and solid line reporting at NCR | Main | Inexpensive activities from a planning team to boost morale, even during budget cuts »

Picking at metrics on bill-review time saved with a fixed-fee arrangement

A small item in a recent Corp. Exec. Board document opines that “Fixed fees save about 100 hours of scarce lawyer time a year because in-house counsel no longer need to review invoices. The annual renegotiation process takes around 6-8 hours of general counsel time.” By my quick calculation, since internal lawyer time costs around $200 an hour (See my post of April 3, 2005 with its estimate of $150 an hour.), the net saving would be approximately $16,000. But the basis for the purported savings of hours is murky.

Whence the 100-hour figure? The page refers to Coachmen Industries, which might be the source of this estimate, and the accompanying footnote simply says CEB “research.” Perhaps the author estimated that to review a normal, hourly-rate invoice takes about eight hours a month. If a single matter is under the arrangement, there is no way to reach the 100-hour savings mark. No one pores over bills with that might time and attention

To me, the negotiation figure for the general counsel is anybody’s guess and varies wildly. I think it also unrealistic to maintain that a fixed-fee arrangement entails no maintenance time during its term.

Posted on July 3, 2007 at 11:03 AM in Outside Counsel | Permalink

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Post a comment