Rees Morrison has consulted to more than 250 law departments (and several law firms) over 22 years to help them better manage themselves and their outside counsel. For more, visit reesmorrison.com, email me, or call 973.568.9110.

All posts (C) 2005-9 Rees W. Morrison.
If you would like a Metapost Plus: please email me with the name and I will send it.

Archive by Month


Archive by Category

Technorati Profile Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.

« Ill-effects of partners shuttling among law firms | Main | Blogs by in-house lawyers or specifically for law departments »

The $2 billion US firm, Latham & Watkins, and thoughts on client influence over billionaire firms

The 2007 gross revenue of Latham & Watkins was just over $2 billion. As reported in the Wall St. J., Feb. 11, 2008 at B2, its profit per partner reached $2.27 million. Skadden Arps might also breach the $2 billion mark. At $2 billion in revenue, a law firm would not be on the Fortune 500 list, where company number 500 is a bit above $3 billion in revenue, but not that far off.

Consider that the majority of law departments in the United States have five or fewer lawyers (See my post of Feb. 9, 2008: 60% smaller than 5 lawyers.). That group of departments probably spends less than $3 million each year on outside counsel, since a typical level is about $600,000 per lawyer spent on outside counsel. Suppose at most one-third of that spend goes to the firm with the most fees, that firm – if it were a twice-billionaire firm – would get from that client .05 percent of its revenue (See my post of Dec. 4, 2006: nothing speaks louder than money.).

What miniscule client can push around a massive law firm that is so big and so profitable?

Posted on February 20, 2008 at 01:35 PM in Outside Counsel | Permalink

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Post a comment