« Whether or not large law departments are more managerially innovative | Main | Meddling in law firm management: push law firms to use lawyers in lower-cost (rate) cities »
To what degree should a law department get credit for releasing reserves?
The law department weighs in when the decision is whether to create a loss reserve and for how much. No company should give its law department an incentive to inflate reserves, even though auditors would check such a manipulation.
Certainly, reserves could be one part of total legal spending. But whether law departments should be able to take credit for a reduction in reserves is problematic, as is true with whether they should get credit for recoveries (See my posts March 12, 2005 on a law department that funded its matter management system in return for reductions in reserves; of Nov. 25, 2005 about whether law departments should manage settlement funds and recovered amounts; Feb. 8, 2006 on DuPont’s collection efforts; Nov. 28, 2005 and Feb. 16, 2006 on IP recoveries; March 15, 2006 on litigation recoveries; March 28, 2006 on profit centers and EMC; March 17, 2006 about Autodesk’s; March 15, 2006 on insurance reimbursements; but May 19, 2006 on the problematic side of crediting recoveries.).
Posted on June 15, 2006 at 10:36 AM in Non-Law Firm Costs | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834519fb069e200d83563c68269e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference To what degree should a law department get credit for releasing reserves? :
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.