Rees Morrison, Esq., is an expert consultant to general counsel on management issues. Visit his website,, write Rees@ReesMorrison(dot)com, or call him at 973.568.9110.
Related Posts with Thumbnails

Past Posts by Category

  • Benchmarks
  • Clients
  • Knowledge Mgt.
  • Non-Law Firm Costs
  • Outside Counsel
  • Productivity
  • Showing Value
  • Structure
  • Talent
  • Technology
  • Thinking
  • This Blog
  • Thoughts/Observations
  • Tools

  • Past Posts by Month

    Technorati Profile Creative Commons License This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.

    « The double-entendre of competitive bids for fixed fees | Main | When you compete work, how many incumbent firms, how many new contenders? »

    Practice area benchmarks: a retrospective

    While I have complained about the lack of benchmark metrics for practice areas (See my posts of July 20, 2005 and of May 28, 2005 on this missing set of metrics.), in fact some have appeared.

    Metrics for litigators are discussed (See my posts of Jan. 25, 2006 on lawsuits pending; May 31, 2005 on Canadian case loads per litigator; and June 15, 2006 on claims per lawsuit.). Intellectual property data also shows up (See my posts of Aug. 3, 2005 and July 18, 2006 on patents; and April 9, 2006 on trademarks.) as does data on international mergers and acquisitions deals per lawyer (See my post of Dec. 22, 2005). Contracts handled per commercial lawyer make an appearance (See my post of Jan. 6, 2006.) and hints of HR matters per lawyer (See my post of Jan. 3, 2006 on EEOC charges and June 7, 2006 on lawyers per 1,000 employees.).

    Still incognito are metrics that suggest the appropriate staff for environmental work, antitrust and import/export. Soon these too, and other practice group metrics, will be unmasked (See my post of April 7, 2006 on international lawyers in the US; and Dec. 22, 2005 on compliance spend compared to legal spend.).

    Posted on September 3, 2006 at 10:34 PM in Benchmarks | Permalink


    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

    The comments to this entry are closed.