Rees Morrison, Esq., is an expert consultant to general counsel on management issues. Visit his website, ReesMorrison.com, write Rees@ReesMorrison(dot)com, or call him at 973.568.9110.
Related Posts with Thumbnails

Past Posts by Category

  • Benchmarks
  • Clients
  • Knowledge Mgt.
  • Non-Law Firm Costs
  • Outside Counsel
  • Productivity
  • Showing Value
  • Structure
  • Talent
  • Technology
  • Thinking
  • This Blog
  • Thoughts/Observations
  • Tools

  • Past Posts by Month

  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005



































  • Technorati Profile Creative Commons License This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.

    « Partner rates as a function of cost of living allowance (COLA wars) | Main | Weighted averages press heavily on us, in two versions »

    Even odds for defendants in US patent and trademark litigation, and frequent reductions of awards

    Out of a research set of 1,124 US federal district court IP cases – 670 patent, 436 trademark, and 18 both – decided between 1980 and June 2005, “on average since 1983, plaintiffs … are awarded damages approximately 53% of the time” according to the 2006 Patent and Trademark Damages Study by PwC at 5. So much is written about the costs of patent lawsuits, especially, but law departments and their counsel fare quite well; plaintiffs can’t be too encouraged if they win barely more than one half of the time.

    As to the vaunted litigation surge, the number of patent cases brought has climbed steadily from 1,171 in 1991 to 3,075 in 2004; for trademarks, the same timeframe saw an increase from 2,220 to 3,508 filings (id at 7). During those 14 years, corporate revenue in the US might well have doubled, or more, so IP cases filed per billion dollars of revenue appear to have roughly kept pace.

    Finally, what amazed me (at 23) is that in “patent decisions, only about 30% of the damages decisions issued by US federal district courts during this entire period were affirmed (i.e., left unchanged by the appellate court.” We always read about huge awards, but less frequently do we read about those decisions being overturned, adjusted, or remanded. Therefore, in proportion to revenue growth, and adjusted for inflation (See my post of Dec. 31, 2006 on this calculation.), the numbers and damages of patent litigation appear less frightening than their usual description, and victory is had as often as not by those who are sued.

    Posted on December 31, 2006 at 04:52 PM in Non-Law Firm Costs | Permalink

    Comments

    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

    Thank you for pointing out this PWC Study - I enjoyed the overview and agree with several points.

    However, I have reviewed the study and find some points where I disagree with your characterizations. First, while 53% of the cases result in damage awards according to the study, since the study does not count injunctions, summary judgements, and motions to dismiss. The "success" of a plaintiff in achieving an injunction can sometimes be far more valuable than damages. In this case, the 53% damages figure from the survey does not directly support the assertion that plaintiffs "win barely more than one half of the time."

    Second, while the survey does assert that 30% of the damage decisions issued by US federal district courts were affirmed, the 'other' 70% were overturned, adjusted, or remanded. The survey does not indicate what happens in these 70% of the cases, from my experience the damage awards can be increased.

    There are, of course, other costs of litigation not directly quantified in this survey, particularly the mind share and distractions of the executives and technologists in participating in the litigation. I am not sure that many people who have been sued feel victorious, no matter the outcome.

    Posted by: Michael E. Woods | Dec 31, 2006 10:38:26 PM

    The comments to this entry are closed.