Rees Morrison, Esq., is an expert consultant to general counsel on management issues. Visit his website, ReesMorrison.com, write Rees@ReesMorrison(dot)com, or call him at 973.568.9110.
Related Posts with Thumbnails

Past Posts by Category

  • Benchmarks
  • Clients
  • Knowledge Mgt.
  • Non-Law Firm Costs
  • Outside Counsel
  • Productivity
  • Showing Value
  • Structure
  • Talent
  • Technology
  • Thinking
  • This Blog
  • Thoughts/Observations
  • Tools

  • Past Posts by Month

  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005



































  • Technorati Profile Creative Commons License This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.

    « A plausible goal: 80 percent of all work to the selected panel of firms? | Main | Microsoft’s patent portfolio, patent litigation and spending »

    Forces that may slow or reverse the lock-in that converged firms presumably enjoy

    Once a law department has chosen a firm to handle work in a certain area, and dropped other firms that had been covering that work, the department’s lawyers and clients attach more to the chosen firm. That firm will get to know more internal clients, will (presumably) arrange for its better lawyers to serve that important corporate client, will invest in systems, processes, and know-how, and will develop familiarity with the company and its legal issues.

    One might think, therefore, that over time, as more and more law departments reduce their firms used to a smaller number, that those favored survivors will develop greater stickiness – it will be very hard to replace or supplant them (See my post of Jan. 27, 2006 on the endowment effect.).

    That expectation of glued-together relationships may prove wrong. A law department will have much better data available about the matters in the areas of law and their costs, courtesy of the firm. With that data, the department will be able to price and value the services more assuredly than when the data were scattered among many firms.

    Basic legal services being competently supplied, law department will start to think more about software, knowledge management, preventive law, training, and other operational efficiencies; expectations of a different sort will rise. More generally, the honeymoon will not last forever, and bickering and irritations will arise so other legal grass will glow greener. With the work all in one bundle, the department will find it easier to describe and move the bundle if it should choose to.

    The plum will be tastier, so the firms that compete with the converged firm will try harder for a bite or the entire fruit. Also the law department will have gone through a competitive bid process and understands how to do it.

    For all these reasons, the centrifugal forces of convergence may turn centripetal.

    Posted on May 13, 2007 at 09:20 AM in Outside Counsel | Permalink

    Comments

    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

    The comments to this entry are closed.